Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery ; : 164-169, 2019.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-762770

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The conventional surgical method for reconstructing orbital floor fractures involves restoration of orbital continuity by covering an onlay with a thin material under the periorbital region. However, in large orbital floor fractures, the implant after inserting is often dislocated, leading to malposition. This study aimed to propose a novel implanting method and compare it with existing methods. METHODS: Among patients who underwent surgery for large orbital floor fractures, 24 who underwent the conventional onlay implanting method were compared with 21 who underwent the novel γ implanting method that two implant sheets were stacked and bent to resemble the shape of the Greek alphabet γ. When inserting a γ-shaped implant, the posterior ledge of the orbital floor was placed between the two sheets and the bottom sheet was impacted onto the posterior wall of the maxilla to play a fixative role while the top sheet was placed above the residual orbital floor to support orbital contents. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for data analyses. RESULTS: Compared to the conventional onlay method, the gamma method resulted in better restoration of orbital contents, better improvement of enophthalmos, and fewer revision surgeries. CONCLUSION: Achieving good surgical outcomes for extended orbital floor fractures is known to be difficult. However, better surgical outcomes could be obtained by using the novel implantation method of impacting a γ-shaped porous polyethylene posteriorly.


Subject(s)
Humans , Enophthalmos , Inlays , Maxilla , Methods , Orbit , Orbital Fractures , Orbital Implants , Polyethylene , Statistics as Topic
2.
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery ; : 203-206, 2019.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-762762

ABSTRACT

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and highly aggressive neuroectodermal carcinoma arising from mechanoreceptor Merkel cells. Multiple MCCs are even rarer. We report a case of two independent MCCs simultaneously present in the cheek of a patient, which were effectively and esthetically treated using a cheek flap. Punch biopsy performed in a 60-year-old woman admitted with a chief complaint of two skin-colored hard nodules in her left cheek, accompanied by an itching sensation, was suggestive of MCC. Accordingly, we performed sentinel lymph node biopsy through the modified Blair incision under general anesthesia, in cooperation with the head and neck surgery department. The defect was covered with a cheek flap by slightly extending the existing incision following wide excision with a safety margin of 1 cm. This paper is significant in that it introduces an effective reconstruction technique that maintains function using a cheek flap for the management of this rare case. In addition, this paper is the first to classify multiple MCCs according to the time of onset. We believe that this paper presents an effective alternative reconstruction technique with sentinel node biopsy through the modified Blair incision.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Anesthesia, General , Biopsy , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell , Cheek , Head , Mechanoreceptors , Merkel Cells , Neck , Neural Plate , Pruritus , Sensation , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Surgical Flaps
3.
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery ; : 64-67, 2018.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-713279

ABSTRACT

Varying degrees of complications can occur after hyaluronic acid filler injections. Tissue necrosis due to interruption of the vascular supply is an early complication that can be severe. If the site of tissue necrosis due to the filler injection is the forehead, successfully reconstructing the region without distorting the key landmarks is challenging. We describe the case of a 50-year-old man who experienced widespread forehead skin necrosis after hyaluronic acid filler injection in the glabellar area. We successfully covered the forehead area with a 3×4-cm² midline necrotic tissue using the modified double-opposing rotation-advancement flap method. Although modified double-opposing rotation-advancement flap closure has the disadvantage of leaving a longer scar compared to conventional double-opposing rotation-advancement flap closure, the additional incision line made along the superior border of the eyebrow aids in camouflaging the scar and decreases eyebrow distortion. Therefore, it is believed that the modified double-opposing rotation-advancement flap technique is an excellent tool for providing adequate soft tissue coverage and minimal free margin distortion when reconstructing widespread skin necrosis in the central mid-lower forehead that can occur after filler injection in the glabellar area.


Subject(s)
Humans , Middle Aged , Cicatrix , Dermal Fillers , Eyebrows , Forehead , Hyaluronic Acid , Methods , Necrosis , Skin , Surgical Flaps
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL